Crissa
Guest
- Thread starter
- #1
Transport Evolved takes this on in a rather straightforward way. Warning, lots of chemistry.
-Crissa
There were eight that TE could find. And he's a financial appointee, not a fire expert.But but but...the Florida CFO said there were "tons" of fires!
DON'T WORRYAutoInsuranceEZ studied the frequency of fires—from all causes, including collisions—in automobiles in 2021. It found that hybrid vehicles, which have an internal combustion engine and an electric motor, had the most fires per 100,000 vehicles (3475), while vehicles with just an internal combustion engine placed second (1530 per 100,000). Fully electric vehicles had the fewest: 25 per 100,000. These findings were based on data from the National Transportation Safety Board and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
FEMA days it's 170,000 fires per year (2014-2016).According to the National Fire Protection Association, which gets its info from the NFIRS, passenger cars averaged 117,400 fires annually between 2013 and 2017.
Incorrect math. No one said "1.5% ICE vehicles catch fire each year", the statistic cited by the "Transport Evolved" video was "catch fire during it's lifetime", which is typically 10 years. So 0.15% would need to catch fire each year to reach the 1.5% lifetime number. That still gives us a number more than double the 170k fires reported, but it's not off by 60x.And the Bureau of Transportation Statistics says that there were 261,037,752 registered vehicles in the US in 2018 (excluding semi-trucks, motorcycles, and buses). So, do a little division, carry the one . . . and that equals .04 percent of vehicles catching fire in a given year.
What I find astounding is the high rate of fires for hybrids and so little mention by media and ICE supporters.......
![]()
......
Which isn't true, of course. Not much of an ICE vehicle is left after the fuel or textiles catch fire - where as a BEV's mass and fire resistance just means that a good chunk of it remains after one or the other has caught.I think the pro-ICE narrative being promoted is that ICE fires are minor and the result of negligence (accidents), while EV fires are spontaneous and inextinguishable.
In my observations, gas cars as well as EV's are pretty much totally consumed if they happen to catch fire. The biggest difference in an accident is the gas gar typically turns into an instand fireball before it has come to a complete stop (because the tank or lines were ruptured and ignited by steel sparking on pavement) while the BEV fire will start very slowly in one part of the battery and slowly build heat, eventually going into thermal runaway of the entire pack. But this takes a number of minutes and gives the occupants time to exit the vehicle that an ICE fire typically doesn't provide.Which isn't true, of course. Not much of an ICE vehicle is left after the fuel or textiles catch fire - where as a BEV's mass and fire resistance just means that a good chunk of it remains after one or the other has caught.
-Crissa
-----------------------------------------![]()
Two weeks ago, a grass fire at a Texas pumpkin patch destroyed over 70 cars. Astute observers will identify the background vehicle in the above photo as a Tesla Model Y.
It burned just like the rest, but doesn’t seem to have contributed to the flames. Maybe EVs aren’t ticking time bombs after all?