hridge2020
Guest
- Thread starter
- #1
I have no issues with it. I really enjoy their content so I'll contribute!Not a huge fan of this sort of video. I personally see their videos as an extension of their business, and as advertising for their business. If it doesn't make financial sense to tear down a vehicle on the business side they shouldn't do it.
I would assume the costs of breaking down a video for reports is baked into their business model since it is one of the products they offer. They likely would not do it if they didn't make money on it.
That said, I am fine that they are selling merchandise, I just think this video was a bit much.
But maybe I am just a little cranky this morning.
Agreed. This video was really weird. Like, who knew a business required money. No way /s.Not a huge fan of this sort of video. I personally see their videos as an extension of their business, and as advertising for their business. If it doesn't make financial sense to tear down a vehicle on the business side they shouldn't do it.
I think you fundamentally misunderstand how businesses operate.Not a huge fan of this sort of video. I personally see their videos as an extension of their business, and as advertising for their business. If it doesn't make financial sense to tear down a vehicle on the business side they shouldn't do it.
I would assume the costs of breaking down a video for reports is baked into their business model since it is one of the products they offer. They likely would not do it if they didn't make money on it.
That said, I am fine that they are selling merchandise, I just think this video was a bit much.
But maybe I am just a little cranky this morning.
Potentially there is a huge difference. From what I understand, before the YT channel companies would bring him a vehicle they wanted to investigate, fund the teardown and buy the report. Notice that in this case, the contract would include $$ (at least a portion of it) up front. This would allow him to start paying the engineers from the get-go. If it was a super-secret project, they might even require full payment up front.I'm confused by this. They built a successful business around reverse engineering and costing vehicles and did it without a YouTube audience.
Why is the Cybertruck any different than those other vehicles? It can't be the cost because they tore down at least one Rivian previously.
Let me reiterate, I don't care that they are selling merchandise. That does not bother me one bit. The tone and the whole "would you do that" part of video is what I don't personally care for. No, I wouldn't do that. But I am not in the business of doing that. They are in the business of tearing vehicles down and documenting their findings though.I think you fundamentally misunderstand how businesses operate.
If he doesn't fund this, his business will whither and die. We will get no more videos. Getting venture funding is completely normal to how businesses operate. You need the money before you can make the product to sell.
Venture capital is currently very low - because of the high interest rates, your business venture needs to exceed just buying government bonds (after risk is included) to even be considered for funding. That's why the NASDAQ is bearish right now.
-Crissa
Elon: "Are you ready? Sit down now, you'll want to be sitting down for this next part... The Cybertruck will cost less than $65k with FSD and tax. I know... I know""it is going to cost me close to 65k for my CT with FSD and tax"
Prepare yourself for sticker shock during the Delivery Day livestream event. Make sure you are sitting down.