• ? Welcome! If you were registered on Cybertruckownersclub.com as of October 1, 2024 or earlier, you can simply login here with the same username and password as on Cybertruckownersclub.

    If you wish, you can remove your account here.

.

OP
OP

EvilNuff

Guest
Well given that the allegations in the lawsuit are completely true yeah its no surprise the judge is letting it proceed. The only question is if Tesla is smart enough to try and reach a settlement to avoid discovery uncovering what is certainly damning internal evidence against them with the FSD scam.
 
OP
OP

Jhodgesatmb

Guest
Wraven said:
The information might be true but because Reuters has shown almost zero journalistic integrity towards Tesla, I’m highly dubious.
Click to expand...
The moderator has cajones stipulating no politics when the post itself is pure politics :-(
 
OP
OP

TwilightHan

Guest
Alpine said:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/tesla...-lawsuit-over-self-driving-claims-2024-05-15/
Click to expand...
A California lawyer not reading the fine print. Golden!

if you read most of the lawsuits open for Tesla across the country, they all blame Elon and what he says through media instead of taking responsibility and reading the text when buying FSD and agreements.
it’s literally a joke at this point as lawyers are copying and pasting other law firms introduction word for word on why Mr Asperger Elon is bad and how everyone’s lives are poorer because of him.

The pregnant lady that decided to let her two year old run around inside her Model X, with the key in the car, and he put it in drive while she tried to physicall stop it by standing in front of it and getting crushed between the car and garage. What happened to that case that has been going on for almost 5 years? It recently got dismissed.

Legal system is a gambling system and there are lots of bad judges, so nothing is guaranteed. However it’s sad that no one can take responsibility for their purchasing decisions.
 
OP
OP

Kahpernicus

Guest
espresso-drumbeat said:
Where? Not in the OP neither in the linked article.
Click to expand...

The article is about the court filings of the lawsuit.

The case is In re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.
Click to expand...
It's an ongoing lawsuit and this is an update of what's happening.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco said owners could pursue negligence and fraud-based claims, to the extent they relied on Tesla's representations regarding vehicles' hardware and ability to drive coast-to-coast across the U.S.

Without ruling on the merits, Lin said that "if Tesla meant to convey that its hardware was sufficient to reach high or full automation, the plainly alleges sufficient falsity."

…


The judge dismissed some other claims.
Tesla and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for Tesla vehicle owners did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The case was led by Thomas LoSavio, a retired California lawyer who said he paid an $8,000 premium in 2017 for Full Self-Driving capabilities on a Tesla Model S, believing it would make driving safer if his reflexes deteriorated as he aged.
Click to expand...


This is the problem with people pulling out the boogey man of "the media" or whatever.
 
OP
OP

espresso-drumbeat

Guest
Kahpernicus said:
The article is about the court filings of the lawsuit.

It's an ongoing lawsuit and this is an update of what's happening.

This is the problem with people pulling out the boogey man of "the media" or whatever.
Click to expand...
LOL - still no court filing provided.

This is the problem with people still believing that legacy aka mainstream media aka fake news (especially reutrers) has any shred of credibility
 
OP
OP

Kahpernicus

Guest
espresso-drumbeat said:
LOL - still no court filing provided.

This is the problem with people still believing that legacy aka mainstream media aka fake news (especially reutrers) has any shred of credibility
Click to expand...
You can literally go look up the case information, with the case number provided in the article.

?
 
OP
OP

Cougs

Guest
Electrified warned about this so let us no take the information more than it deserves and stop it before it gets out of hand close this forum.
 
OP
OP

CyberGus

Guest
Tesla did a bad job of marketing FSD. Charging a few thousand to enable basic ADAS features like TACC is actually in-line with industry pricing, but they also dangled "self-driving Real Soon Now" which led to angry customers when it didn't materialize.

Would I pay a few thousand for basic ADAS? Sure. Would I have paid extra for self-driving in 2015 with the promise that it might be finished in 10 years? lol no

If you paid for a "coming soon" feature that was still not delivered by the time the vehicle warranty expired, I think you deserve a refund, or at least transferability.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
 
Top